The Times They Are A-Changin’ (Part 1)

02h31993_woman-holding-garment_web.jpg

(Image licensed by Ingram Publishing)

Martin L. Young Jr. |

Up and downs, and ups, of the cleaning business, told first-hand

CONCORD, N.C. — The cleaning industry is in a state of constant change.

I had the advantage of growing up in the family business, spending time on the counter and doing maintenance on equipment.

After college, I got away from cleaning, but found that I was much happier working for myself. I came back in 1981 and had the advantage of my dad being an excellent spotter, with an attitude that “good enough was not good enough,” only excellence was good enough.

For him, stains were why the clothes were there, and stains were to be gone when the customer received the garment at the counter. Seventy-seven years and counting. Now, a little history.

In 1930, when my dad started, petroleum was king. Large cleaning operations were on the edge of town, due to the constant threat of fire. These plants would pick-up from “pressing clubs,” which had the finishing equipment but did no cleaning.

After World War II, a new chemical (perchloroethylene) came to market. It did not burn and had three times the grease-cutting power of the naptha/petroleum that was commonly used to dry-clean at that time.

With no threat of fire, this allowed the growth of small plants in town that cleaned and pressed on site. With three times the “strength,” clothes could be turned around in a much shorter time span. Even one hour, when requested.

At that time, no one was looking at worker exposure and environmental impact. We were cleaning clothes.

Then came the charge system of detergent (anionic). This boosted the effectiveness of both perc and petroleum.

(Editor's note: The Merriam-Webster dictionary says "anionic" detergents consist of an alkali metal salt or ammonium salt of a strong acid for heavy-duty laundering.)

Things went well until the early 1960s, when through the advances of modern chemistry, polyester came to market. Almost overnight, the piece count fell off and most consumers stopped buying natural fibers like silk and linen. Cleaning operations simply disappeared.

It took a while for the consumer to realize that the synthetic fibers did not look or feel like the natural fibers. Then, in the late 1970s, the consumer once again began buying garments made of natural fibers.

The polyester leisure suit died and natural fibers, requiring professional care to look their best, made a return to the marketplace.

The problem at that point was that the institutional memory of the cleaning industry had diminished greatly. The monofilament thermo-polymer fabric was easy to spot, and finishing was little more than blow with steam and go.

Silk requires a light spotting touch, and linen requires effort to give it the proper look and drape. I look back to 1985 as the day the rush toward mediocracy began and the “Sorry Tag” gained a firm footing in the distributor’s inventory.

Check back Thursday for the conclusion.

About the author

Martin L. Young Jr.

Industry Consultant and Trainer

Martin L. Young Jr. has been an industry consultant and trainer for 20 years, and a member of various stakeholder groups on environmental issues. He is a past president of the North Carolina Association of Launderers & Cleaners (NCALC). He grew up in his parents’ plant in Concord, N.C., Young Cleaners, which he operates to this day. Contact him by phone at 704-786-3011, or via e-mail at mayoung@vnet.net.

Advertisement

Latest Podcast

Learn how wet cleaning can fit into your operation so you can more fully serve your clients today, with Michael "Stucky" Szczotka, owner of Eagle Star Equipment and Poseidon Textile Care Systems.

Want more? Visit the archive »

Digital Edition

Latest Classifieds